Saturday 4 June 2011

Review #112: 'The Mummy' (1932)

The image of Boris Karloff, awakening in his tomb and draped in bandages, his skin flaky and old, is one of the most iconic in horror history. Alongside Dracula (1931) and Frankenstein (1931), The Mummy is one of Universal Studio's biggest hits. Unlike the aforementioned, it is not based on a piece of literature, but was inspired by the discovery of Tutankhamun's tomb in 1922. Director Karl Freund was hired two days before the start of filming, and this is possibly the reason for the film's problems, with Freund's experience lying primarily in the cinematography department.

When the tomb of ancient Egyptian priest Imhotep (Boris Karloff) is discovered by an archaeological expedition, an old script is read out aloud that resurrects his mummified body. Ten years later, the archaeological dig continues, and they are approached by a mysterious man who identifies himself as Ardath Bey, claiming he knows the location of the tomb of Princess Ankh-es-en-amon. Excited by the prospect, they begin to dig, but they are unaware that Bey is the resurrected Imhotep, and is searching for the soul of his lost love. He believes that a young woman named Helen (Zita Johann) is the reincarnation of the long-dead Princess, and wants to steal her soul.

Boris Karloff excels here. Although not exactly the most talented of actors, he has the ability to use his sheer colossal presence to get through to the audience. His giant frame and eerie dead eyes pierce the screen, and he overshadows his quite hammy co-stars. There is a reason why Imhotep and his portrayal of Frankenstein's Monster are iconic. Karloff's face is most interesting, and glares out from beneath all the excellent make-up. Thank God, then, for Karloff, as the majority of the film is quite average.

Possibly the main negative of the film is the director Karl Freund. A legend of a cinematographer, he is responsible for some giants of cinema such as Fritz Lang's Metropolis (1927), F.W. Murnau's The Last Laugh (1924) and Tartuffe (1925), and Carl Dreyer's Michael (1924). He is also uncredited as co-director for Universal's Dracula and well as being cinematographer. The direction seems by-the-number and unspectacular, and while Frankenstein was in the safe hands of James Whale, and Dracula in the hands of Tod Browning, The Mummy seems to suffer from Freund's inexperience. 

That said, it is enjoyable in the way that most old horror films are. It is short and snappy, and doesn't outstay its welcome, clocking in at a mere 73 minutes. It is also quite silly, and Imhotep's supernatural abilities reveal some glaring plot-holes. But it obviously has it's fans, as it has been re-made and re-imagined countless amounts of times. Now for the Hammer remake! 


Directed by: Karl Freund
Country: USA

Rating: ***

Tom Gillespie



The Mummy (1932) on IMDb

No comments:

Post a Comment

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...